Donald Trump Says That South Korea Should Pay For U.S. Troops

John Kim, May 5, 2016, 10:40 a.m.


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Wednesday that South Korea should pay for all costs related to U.S. troop presence in the country. Trump made the remark in an interview with CNN, reiterating his long-running argument that the U.S. should be prepared to let allies defend themselves unless they pay more for American defense support. "Why not a 100 percent?" Trump said as the interviewer pointed out that Seoul already shoulders about 50 percent of the cost.

Asked if he meant that countries like South Korea, Japan and Germany should pick up all the expenses, Trump said, "Of course they should pick up all the expense. Why are we paying for this?" Trump also said the U.S. should be "prepared to walk" unless allies pay more, referring apparently to the potential troop withdrawal. In that case, the countries should defend themselves "against North Korea (where) we have a maniac."

“If they don't take care of us properly, if they don't respect us enough to take care of us properly, then you know what will have to happen? Very simple, they're going to have to defend themselves," he said. Trump has long claimed that allies should pay more, but the latest remark is probably the first time he has demanded that allies bear all expenses. That is sure to add to concerns in South Korea and other allies about what effects a Trump presidency will have on the alliances.

About 28,500 American troops are stationed in South Korea to deter North Korean aggression, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War that ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, leaving the divided peninsula still technically at war. Seoul has long shared the cost of stationing U.S. forces. In 2014, the two countries renewed their cost-sharing agreement, known as the Special Measures Agreement, with Seoul agreeing to pay 920 billion won (US$886 million) for the upkeep of the U.S. troops in 2014, a 5.8 percent increase from a year earlier.

Moreover, the American military presence on the peninsula is seen as in line with U.S. national interests in a region marked by a rising China. Last month, Gen. Vincent Brooks, new commander of U.S. Forces Korea, said that Seoul is shouldering a "significant load" of the cost and it would cost more to keep those troops stationed in the U.S. than it does in Korea.

Responding to Trump's remark on the cost of stationing U.S. forces, the South Korean government emphasized the firmness of the alliance between the two countries. "The bipartisan support within the U.S. on its alliance with South Korea is firmer than any time before," a foreign ministry official said on Thursday on condition of anonymity. "We're convinced the alliance based on common values such as democracy and market economy will continue to develop firmly."

 

comments powered by Disqus